Post by account_disabled on Jan 25, 2024 5:40:49 GMT
The perspective of the future we intend for Brazil. Unfortunately, we live in a globally commodified society, dominated by economic rationality, which replaces values with numbers. Contrary to what Kant said, today even dignity has a price. If we want to persist in this model, nothing can be more efficient than children's initiation into consumerism. It's time to listen to voices like Lipovestky's, who preaches salvation through school education. It is there that we can rescue dignity, developing a critical consciousness that can enjoy the benefits of consumption without surrendering to it unconditionally. However, children and advertising will always exist.
What to do then? There are inspiring models. At a recent Buy Phone Number List academic meeting in Porto Alegre, professor Thierry Bourgoignie gave an excellent explanation of the legislation in the province of Quebec, Canada. Simply put, Quebec law became known for prohibiting advertising to children under 13 years of age. This is the law in principle, but detailed regulation specifies what is permitted and under what conditions. The interesting thing is that the law has wide popular acceptance. If we compare Quebec law with the Conar Statute and Resolution 163/2014, of the National Council for the Rights of Children and Adolescents (Conanda), we will find many converging points.
That's right. Despite the discussions about its original vice, the Conanda Resolution has points of convergence with the Conar Statute. Someone will ask: why is this matter still being discussed? For two reasons. The first is because we suffer from ideological inflammation, which affects our ability to discern. We are unable to recognize virtues in our antagonists. Second, because we lack a legitimate regulatory body. I explain this second reason better. From the point of view of concretizing a general clause or an indeterminate legal concept, such as that of abusive advertising for children, there are two possibilities: either the Judiciary is expected to construct a jurisprudence that allows legal certainty guided by the cases judged, or the regulation of law comes to define the contours of the legal concept.
What to do then? There are inspiring models. At a recent Buy Phone Number List academic meeting in Porto Alegre, professor Thierry Bourgoignie gave an excellent explanation of the legislation in the province of Quebec, Canada. Simply put, Quebec law became known for prohibiting advertising to children under 13 years of age. This is the law in principle, but detailed regulation specifies what is permitted and under what conditions. The interesting thing is that the law has wide popular acceptance. If we compare Quebec law with the Conar Statute and Resolution 163/2014, of the National Council for the Rights of Children and Adolescents (Conanda), we will find many converging points.
That's right. Despite the discussions about its original vice, the Conanda Resolution has points of convergence with the Conar Statute. Someone will ask: why is this matter still being discussed? For two reasons. The first is because we suffer from ideological inflammation, which affects our ability to discern. We are unable to recognize virtues in our antagonists. Second, because we lack a legitimate regulatory body. I explain this second reason better. From the point of view of concretizing a general clause or an indeterminate legal concept, such as that of abusive advertising for children, there are two possibilities: either the Judiciary is expected to construct a jurisprudence that allows legal certainty guided by the cases judged, or the regulation of law comes to define the contours of the legal concept.